Opinion

Vinson v. Vinson

  • 880 So. 2d 469
  • 2003 WL 22682451
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Nov 14, 2003
Status
Published
Author
Murdock
On the bench
Crawley, Murdock, Pittman, Yates
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

I concur in those portions of the main opinion regarding custody and the trial court's refusal to hear testimony during the postjudgment hearing; I concur in the result in that part of the main opinion that addresses visitation. As to that part of the main opinion addressing the trial court's failure to award retroactive child support, I dissent and join Judge Crawley's special writing as to that issue. Based on the rationale in Judge Pittman's special writing, I also dissent from the main opinion's reversal of the trial court's grant of the divorce on the ground of adultery.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.