Opinion

Albertson v. Albertson

  • 678 So. 2d 118
  • 1995 WL 681760
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Nov 17, 1995
Status
Published
Author
Robertson
On the bench
Crawley, Robertson
Cited by
83 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

The opinion

This court has long recognized that the sole purpose of periodic alimony is the support of the dependent former spouse. Trammell v. Trammell , 589 So.2d 743 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991); Waltman v. Waltman , 528 So.2d 867 (Ala.Civ.App. 1988). The function of periodic alimony is to provide support to the dependent former spouse until she becomes self-supporting. Harris v. Harris , 543 So.2d 1203 (Ala.Civ.App. 1989); Allen v. Allen , 477 So.2d 457 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985).

The record in this case reveals that the wife has an income in excess of $30,000 per year. In view of the property division and other factors, the award of periodic alimony at this time was an abuse of discretion; the trial court should have reserved the right to award periodic alimony in the future if the need arises.

YATES, J., concurs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.