Opinion

Alabama Power Co. v. Drummond

  • 559 So. 2d 158
  • 1990 Ala. LEXIS 112
  • 1990 WL 32977
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Feb 16, 1990
Status
Published
Author
Houston
On the bench
Hornsby, Houston, Steagall
Cited by
20 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

“It is also well recognized that Alabama law requires the owner of a servient tenement to refrain from doing any act that would interfere with or be inconsistent with the proper right to use and enjoy the easement vested in the owner of the dominant tenement.”

How later courts described this case

  • “It is also well recognized that Alabama law requires the owner of a servient tenement to refrain from doing any act that would interfere with or be inconsistent with the proper right to use and enjoy the easement vested in the owner of the dominant tenement.”
  • noting that a trial court has "broad power to fashion judgments"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

In Magna, Inc. v. Catranis , 512 So.2d 912 , 913 (Ala. 1987), we held:

"An easement is property, 2 Thompson on Real Property 3, § 315 (1980); 2 American Law of Property , 236, § 8, 10 (1952); and it comes within the constitutional provision that no person shall be deprived of his property without due process. Thompson v. Andrews , 39 S.D. 477 , 165 N.W. 9

(1917).

"The owner of a servient estate must abstain from acts interfering with or inconsistent with the proper enjoyment of an easement by the owner of the dominant estate. Snider v. Alabama Power Co. , 346 So.2d 946 (Ala. 1977); Alabama Power Co. v. Martin , 341 So.2d 695 (Ala. 1977)."

Alabama Power Company has the right to flood each square foot of the property on which it has a floodage easement. This is a property right. My respect for property rights will not permit me to diminish or reduce Alabama Power Company's rights simply because it does not need to use at all times all of the property to which it has property rights. Our federal and state constitutions protect such rights and would prohibit judicial deprivation or diminution of such rights based solely upon a judicial determination that in depriving the owner of that property right it can "adjust the equities." I would reverse and remand on the authority of Magna, Inc. v. Catranis , supra; McGuire v. Lawrence , 523 So.2d 380 (Ala. 1988); Snider v. Alabama Power Co. , 346 So.2d 946 (Ala. 1977); Brown v. *Page 163 Alabama Power Co. , 275 Ala. 467 , 156 So.2d 153 (1963).

MADDOX, J., concurs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.