“When the agreement is reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning, an ambiguity exists.”
How later courts described this case
- “When the agreement is reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning, an ambiguity exists.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
I respectfully dissent.
The agreement, in my opinion, is reasonably susceptible to more than one meaning or interpretation. Therefore, the husband should be allowed the opportunity to present parol testimony whereby the true intent of the parties may be determined. *Page 649