Opinion

University of So. Ala. v. Progressive Ins.

  • 904 So. 2d 1242
  • 2004 WL 3017007
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Dec 30, 2004
Status
Published
Author
Johnstone
On the bench
Johnstone, Nabers, Woodall
Cited by
34 cases

"`[W]e cannot create legal arguments for a party based on undelineated general propositions unsupported by authority or argument.'" (quotingSpradlin v. Spradlin, 601 So.2d 76, 79 (Ala. 1992))

How later courts described this case

  • "`[W]e cannot create legal arguments for a party based on undelineated general propositions unsupported by authority or argument.'" (quotingSpradlin v. Spradlin, 601 So.2d 76, 79 (Ala. 1992))

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

I concur fully in the main opinion. I note that § 35-11-370 , Ala. Code 1975, imposed the lien not only upon the settlement money paid to Bell but also upon "all actions, claims, . . . and demands accruing to" Bell.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.