The opinion
I agree with the majority that the first issue decided, i.e. that the street in front of the McClendons' property is not a cul-de-sac as a matter of law, is dispositive of the appeal. Consequently, I see no need to consider the constitutional issues presented or whether they were properly presented to the trial court. See Guy v. Southwest Alabama Council on Alcoholism , 475 So.2d 1190 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985). Hence, I do not agree or disagree with the decision in this aspect of the case.