Opinion

McCoo v. State

  • 921 So. 2d 446
  • 2004 WL 1418199
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Jun 25, 2004
Status
Published
Author
Shaw
On the bench
McMillan, Shaw
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.1%

Reversed on other grounds by Ex Parte State, 921 So. 2d 450 (2005)

The opinion

It is apparent from the trial court's order that McCoo's probation was revoked because he committed a new offense — first degree robbery. The reason for revocation is, thus, sufficiently stated to satisfy the pertinent due-process requirements. Based on Wyatt v. State , 608 So.2d 762 (Ala. 1992), I concur to remand for a statement of the evidence relied on.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.