Opinion

Ex Parte Jackson

  • 881 So. 2d 450
  • 2003 WL 22753456
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Nov 21, 2003
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Brown, Houston, Johnstone
Cited by
2 cases

“Jackson was given advance notice of all documents to be used in her termination hearing.... Because she received all that is required for due process, her due-process claim is without merit.”

How later courts described this case

  • “Jackson was given advance notice of all documents to be used in her termination hearing.... Because she received all that is required for due process, her due-process claim is without merit.”
  • “Due process requires notice and a hearing.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

I believe that Lucy Jackson failed to demonstrate that her employer's alleged failure to comply with § 16-22-14 violated her due process rights. Therefore, I concur in the result.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.