The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2275
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN,
Claimant - Appellant,
and
$11,864 US CURRENCY; $7,800 US CURRENCY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CA-95-318-3-P)
Submitted: May 17, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Arthur Brown, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting summary
judgment and a judgment of forfeiture of $19,664 in United States
currency to the government and denying his motion for reconsidera-
tion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason-
ing of the district court. United States v. Brown, No. CA-95-318-3-
P (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 15, & 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
AFFIRMED
3