Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Apr 4, 1997
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7863

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM KELLY BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-

trict of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CR-93-17, CA-96-48-2-H)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Kelly Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Talore Morris, OF-

FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiter-

rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-93-

17, CA-96-48-2-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.