Opinion

Dewitt v. District of Columbia

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Nov 27, 2023
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Ana C. Reyes
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.4%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

CHRISTOPHER DEWITT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-02738 (UNA)

)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s pro se complaint, ECF No. 1, and application for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. The Court will grant Plaintiff’s IFP

application and, for the reasons explained herein, it will dismiss this matter without prejudice.

Plaintiff sues the District of Columbia, the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department’s 7th

Precinct, and D.C. Police Commander John Branch. He purports to bring this case pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983, and broadly seeks damages for “inhumane treatment and aggravated circumstances

while in custody of [the] 7th precinct.” The remainder of the complaint is left largely blank, with

no facts, context, or details necessary to state, or even so much as infer, a legal claim.

Pro se litigants must comply with the Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F.

Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) requires a complaint to

contain “(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction [and] . . . (2) a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ.

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009). The Rule 8 standard ensures that

defendants receive fair notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive

answer and an adequate defense. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, as

presented, neither the Court nor Defendants can reasonably be expected to identify Plaintiff’s

claims, and the allegations fall well short of stating a plausible claim.

For these reasons, this case is dismissed without prejudice. A separate order accompanies

this memorandum opinion.

Date: November 27, 2023

/s/_________________________

ANA C. REYES

United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.