Opinion

State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City

61 P.3d 234
2002 OK 97
2002 WL 31818927

Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed: Dec 26, 2002
Status: Published
Author: Watt
On the bench: James F. Davis of Andrews Davis Legg Bixler Milsten & Price
Cited by: 97 cases
Authority: More cited than 13.7%

The opinion

WATT, V.C.J.,

with whom WINCHESTER, J. joins, dissenting:

DISSENTING OPINION

¶ 1 I dissent to the majority opinion. I would reverse the trial court for having declined to impose sanctions under 12 O.S. § 2011. I would affirm the trial court’s having awarded attorneys’ fees under its inherent power to do so where bad faith has been established. My reasons for dissenting here are set out at some length in my dissenting opinion in Tal III, State ex rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City, 2000 OK 70 , 19 P.3d 268 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.