Opinion

Brown v. Division of Social

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jan 24, 1996
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2022

ROBERT LEE BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, City of Lynch-

burg, Virginia,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-

trict of Virginia, at Lynchburg. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-94-68-L)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 24, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Richard Lingafelt,

GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDMANN & DARBY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order* denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no rever-

sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magis-

trate judge. Brown v. Division of Social Servs., No. CA-94-68-L

(W.D. Va. May 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

*

Judgment was entered by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993).

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.