The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7560
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
versus
JOSEPH NATHANIEL BROWN, JR., a/k/a Joe Jr.,
Defendant - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES DAVID WHALEY,
Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-93-151)
Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Nathaniel Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles David
Whaley, MORCHOWER, LUXTON & WHALEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
request for monetary sanctions from his attorney if his attorney
failed to comply with a court order by a certain date. We have
reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Brown, No. CR-93-151 (E.D. Va.
Aug. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3