Opinion

People v. Villa-Gomez

9 Cal. App. 5th 527
215 Cal. Rptr. 3d 161
2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 207

Court: California Court of Appeal
Filed: Mar 9, 2017
Status: Published
Author: Duarte
On the bench: Murray, Duarte, Nicholson
Cited by: 14 cases

The opinion

DUARTE, J.,

Concurring.—I concur in the judgment. I concur in the opinion, except part I.B.2., the analysis of prejudice and its conclusion. Because I agree with the conclusion reached in part I.B.l. of the discussion— that the trial did not err in admitting defendant’s gang affiliation statements during booking—I see no need to continue with a separate analysis of prejudice based on hypothetical error, and will refrain from doing so here.

Appellant’s petition for review by the Supreme Court was denied June 14, 2017, S241236.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.