Opinion

Harris County v. James Charlton

  • 112 Tex. 19
  • 243 S.W. 460
  • 1922 Tex. LEXIS 128
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 29, 1922
Status
Published
Author
Cureton
On the bench
Piebson, Cureton
Cited by
21 cases

The opinion

ON REHEARING.

In their motion for rehearing defendants in error call our attention to the item of $497.52, which the trial court found was wrongfully retained from the County funds by defendant in error Charlton, but which was found by said Court to be barred by limitation.

The trial court having found and adjudged that this amount of $497.52 was barred by limitation, it would have been proper for us to have affirmed the judgment of the trial court as to this item also.

We therefore grant the rehearing as to this item, and affirm the judgment of the trial court as to it. In all other respects the motion ior rehearing is overruled.

Chief Justice CURETON

took no part in the decision of this case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.