Opinion

In Re Union Cent. Life Ins. Co.

  • 208 La. 253
  • 23 So. 2d 63
  • 1945 La. LEXIS 866
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Jun 5, 1945
Status
Published
Author
O'Niell
On the bench
Hamiter, O'Niell, Rogers, Higgins
Cited by
14 cases

third possessor is someone other than a mere tenant, a trespasser, or one having only physical possession

How later courts described this case

  • third possessor is someone other than a mere tenant, a trespasser, or one having only physical possession

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

O’NIELL, C. J.,

dissents from the holding that the sale to Mrs. Dora Thomas was null because of her failure to pay the mortgage debt due to the Union Central Life Insurance Company, for the payment of which debt she reserved the price for which she bought the property from the administrator of her husband’s estate on May 9, 1931, and therefore dissents from the holding that Mrs. Thomas was not a third possessor, in the meaning of article 68 of the Code of Practice, when the Union Central Life Insurance Company proceeded against her by the hypothecary action and bought the property at the sheriff’s sale, on July 29, 1933, to satisfy the debt.

HIGGINS; J., takes no part.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.