The opinion
THE COURT.
The application for a hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal of the second appellate district, division two, is denied.
[1] We base our denial solely upon the fact that it clearly appears that any negligence on the part of the notary, Eives, was not a proximate cause of the injury to plaintiff.
We deem it proper to further point out that in the case of Anderson v. Aronsohn, 28 Cal. App. Dec. 216, which is referred to in the opinion, the decision of the district court of appeal was vacated by this court and the cause ordered to a hearing herein, where it is now pending.
All the Justices concurred.