Opinion

Los Angeles City School District v. Tucker

  • 99 Cal. App. 390
  • 278 P. 507
  • 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 514
Court
California Court of Appeal
Filed
Jun 11, 1929
Status
Published
On the bench
Preston
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.2%

The opinion

THE COURT.

The petition for a rehearing is denied. .

Appellant contends in the petition • for a rehearing that the Noyes Marble & Tile Company, is not entitled to judgment because its stop notice was not filed in time. This point was not urged in the original briefs. There is, however, no merit in this contention. The Noyes Marble & Tile Company had thirty days after filing of notice of completion of contract within which to file its stop notice. (Bird v. American Surety Co., 175 Cal. 625 [ 166 Pac. 1009 ]; Hughes Mfg. Co. v. Hathaway, 174 Cal. 44 [ 161 Pac. 1159 ]; Simons Brick Co. v. Hetzel et al., 72 Cal. App. 1 [ 236 Pac. 657 ].)

The notice of completion was not filed until May 9, 1925, and said stop notice was filed June 8, 1925; therefore, the stop notice was in time and the surety is liable to Noyes Marble & Tile Company.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.