Opinion

Harris v. State, Dept. of Health

  • 123 Idaho 295
  • 847 P.2d 1156
  • 1992 Ida. LEXIS 189
Court
Idaho Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 31, 1992
Status
Published
Author
Johnson
On the bench
McDevitt, Bistline, Johnson, Bakes, Trout
Cited by
79 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.2%

noting that the statute reflects a “deliberate policy choice” to overrule Sterling v. Bloom, 111 Idaho 211, 723 P.2d 755 (1986), 2 and was based on a legislative finding that the courts had extended liability too far in the other direction

How later courts described this case

  • noting that the statute reflects a “deliberate policy choice” to overrule Sterling v. Bloom, 111 Idaho 211, 723 P.2d 755 (1986), 2 and was based on a legislative finding that the courts had extended liability too far in the other direction
  • holding department immune from liability-pursuant to I.C. § 6-904A(2) for injuries caused by a juvenile who committed a burglary and sexual assault while under department supervision
  • in an unrelated charge, finding State not required to prove a negative but rather the defendant has burden to introduce evidence that an exception applies
  • acknowledging constitutional authority of Legislature to reassert sovereign immunity eroded by courts

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

JOHNSON, Justice,

concurring and dissenting.

I concur in parts II and III of the Court’s opinion, but respectfully dissent from part I.

In my view, Jacobsen v. City of Rathdrum, 115 Idaho 266 , 766 P.2d 736 (1988), and G & M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co., 119 Idaho 514 , 808 P.2d 851 (1991), dictate that we vacate the trial court’s summary judgment. As I read the record, applying the standards in Jacobsen and G & M Farms, we should hold that there is a genuine issue of material fact whether the Department was reckless, willful, and wanton in its supervision of Barajas. I believe the Court’s opinion incorrectly requires that Harris meet an elevated standard of proof to avoid summary judgment.

In my view, in construing the evidence in the record most favorably to Harris, and giving Harris the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn therefrom, there is evidence to support each element of the prima facie case necessary for the theory of reckless, willful, and wanton conduct. Cf. G &M Farms, 119 Idaho at 526 , 808 P.2d at 526 ; Jacobsen, 115 Idaho at 272 , 766 P.2d at 742 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.