NAS report "lacks the specificity that would justify a conclusion that it provides a basis to find the forensic evidence admitted at trial to be infirm or faulty"
How later courts described this case
- NAS report "lacks the specificity that would justify a conclusion that it provides a basis to find the forensic evidence admitted at trial to be infirm or faulty"
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Gkeen, J.
(concurring in the result only) — As to the polygraph issue, I concur in the result only. The product of a polygraph test is inadmissible unless stipulated to by both the defense and the prosecution. State v. Ross, 7 Wn. App. 62, 69 , 497 P.2d 1343 , 53 A.L.R.3d 997 , review denied, 81 Wn.2d 1003 (1972). Here, the parties did not stipulate to the polygraphs; hence, they were inadmissible.
Reconsideration denied September 7, 1978.
Review denied by Supreme Court January 19, 1979.