Opinion

Goodridge v. Ypsilanti Township Board

  • 209 Mich. App. 344
  • 529 N.W.2d 665
  • 1995 Mich. App. LEXIS 106
Court
Michigan Court of Appeals
Filed
Mar 20, 1995
Status
Published
Author
Griffin
On the bench
Taylor, Griffin, Schma
Cited by
11 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.9%

Reversed on other grounds by Goodridge v. Ypsilanti Township Board, 451 Mich. 446 (1996)

Later courts went against this

  • Criticized by Command Officers Ass'n v. City of Allen Park, 210 Mich. App. 485 (1995)

    We believe that Goodridge was wrongly decided and, therefore, follow Goodridge only because we are constrained to do so by Administrative Order No. 1994-4.
    Michigan Court of AppealsMay 12, 1995Read it

The opinion

Griffin, J.

(dissenting). In reversing the order of the lower court, the majority has held that the circuit court committed error requiring reversal in following the precedent of three prior decisions of this Court: Werner v Macomb Co Civil Service Comm, 77 Mich App 533 ; 258 NW2d 549 (1977), Hunn v Madison Heights, 60 Mich App 326 ; 230 NW2d 414 (1975), and Solomon v Highland Park Civil Service Comm, 47 Mich App 536 ; 209 NW2d 698 (1973). I respectfully dissent.

Today’s decision overturning Werner, Hunn, and Solomon and establishing a new rule of law is imprudent and extraordinary. Neither petitioner nor respondent has requested such an action. Further, the issue ruled upon has not been preserved, raised, briefed, or argued. The citizens of Ypsilanti Township deserve better.

Without notice, the majority has established a new construction of the firemen and policemen’s civil service act, MCL 38.514; MSA 5.3364, as the statute existed before its amendment by 1986 PA 155 . Respondent township was not afforded an opportunity to argue the merits of our prior deci *355 sions or to address other potentially important considerations such as detrimental reliance, stare decisis, and legislative acquiescence.

I would decide only those issues that are raised and preserved. I agree with the circuit court that the decision of the Ypsilanti Township Civil Service Commission is supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence on the record. Further, the alleged violation of the Open Meetings Act, MCL 15.261 et seq.; MSA 4.1800(11) et seq., by the township board is without consequence because the legal authority for bringing the present charges lies with the township supervisor, not the township board. Petitioner’s remaining issues are without merit.

I would affirm.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.