Opinion

State v. Wright

  • 184 N.C. App. 464
  • 646 S.E.2d 625
  • 2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 1481
Court
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Filed
Jul 3, 2007
Status
Published
Author
Jackson
On the bench
Levinson, McGee, Jackson
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

JACKSON, Judge

concurring.

I concur fully with the majority. However, assuming arguendo that defendant was in custody at the time of his conversation with Onslow County Sheriff Ed Brown, he had been given his Miranda warnings twice in the prior four days. Defendant first was read his Miranda rights upon arriving at the sheriff’s office on the night of 12 *474 January 2004, and he was again advised of his rights on 15 January 2004 prior to being interviewed by the NCIS agents at their office. Therefore, even if it was error for the trial court to admit defendant’s statements to Sheriff Brown, any error was harmless as defendant had been adequately Mirandized.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.