Opinion

Brown v. Sandy City Board of Adjustment

  • 339 Utah Adv. Rep. 13
  • 957 P.2d 207
  • 1998 Utah App. LEXIS 19
  • 1998 WL 159807
Court
Court of Appeals of Utah
Filed
Mar 26, 1998
Status
Published
Author
Bench
On the bench
Bench, Billings, Jackson
Cited by
16 cases

explaining that “because zoning ordinances are in derogation of a property owner’s common-law right to unrestricted use of his or her property, provisions therein restricting property uses should be strictly construed” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

How later courts described this case

  • explaining that “because zoning ordinances are in derogation of a property owner’s common-law right to unrestricted use of his or her property, provisions therein restricting property uses should be strictly construed” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • reversing summary judgment in favor of City prohibiting homeowner’s from renting homes short-term under ordinance; no taking claim was alleged — court held that language of ordinance did not prohibit short-term rentals
  • ordinance that allows use of dwelling for occupancy by single family and does not limit use by duration of occupancy does not prohibit short-term rentals
  • reviewing city's administrative interpretation of its zoning ordinance

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BENCH, Judge,

concurring in result:

Sandy City relies upon an ordinance in arguing that its Development Code does not permit short-term leases of property. The ordinance provides as follows:

No land shall be used or occupied and no building or structure shall be designed,. created, altered, used or occupied for any use, except those uses specifically permitted on the land upon which the building or structure is located or erected or use established as permitted in the regulations for the district in which said land is located.

Sandy City, Utah, Dev.Code § 15-21-11 (1996) (emphasis added). Essentially, Sandy takes the position that every use of property is prohibited unless the use is specifically permitted by ordinance. That approach to zoning is diametrically opposed to the common law followed in Utah. See, e.g., Patterson v. Utah County Bd. of Adjustment, 893 P.2d 602 , 606 (Utah Ct.App.1995) (stating zoning ordinances are to be strictly construed against the municipality because they are “in derogation of a property owner’s common-law right to unrestricted use of his or her property”).

As the main opinion concludes, short-term rentals are permitted in Sandy unless the city passes an ordinance to specifically prohibit them.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.