Opinion

City of Whittier v. Dixon

  • 24 Cal. 2d 664
  • 151 P.2d 5
  • 153 A.L.R. 956
  • 1944 Cal. LEXIS 267
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 11, 1944
Status
Published
Author
Edmonds
On the bench
Traynor, Edmonds
Cited by
46 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.7%

“Parking spaces that tend to stabilize a business section, by making it readily accessible to trade, benefit the property in the vicinity.”

How later courts described this case

  • “Parking spaces that tend to stabilize a business section, by making it readily accessible to trade, benefit the property in the vicinity.”
  • upholding special assessment for creation of public parking spaces
  • assessments for off-street parking upheld

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

EDMONDS, J.,

Concurring and Dissenting. I concur in the conclusion of my associates that the Vehicle Parking District Act of 1943 (Stats. 1943, p. 2859) is valid upon its face, but I again point out that a question of public interest is decided in a “friendly suit” to which only the city, its clerk, and the publisher of the municipality’s legal advertising are parties. In my opinion, such an action is collusive and for the reasons I have previously stated, should not be entertained by this court. (City and County of San Francisco v. Boyd, 22 Cal.2d 685, 707 [ 140 P.2d 666 ] ; and City and County of San Francisco v. Linares, 16 Cal.2d 441, 448 [ 106 P.2d 639 ].)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.