Opinion

Application of Goodwin

  • 597 P.2d 762
  • 1979 OK 106
  • 1979 Okla. LEXIS 269
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Jul 12, 1979
Status
Published
Author
Hodges
On the bench
Ala, Irwin, Williams, Simms, Hodges, Hargrave
Cited by
47 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.7%

The opinion

HODGES, Justice,

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

The petitioners present only one appeala-ble issue which is the trial court’s ruling that restricted the activities of the Authority to the geographical boundaries of Cherokee County, Oklahoma. I concur with the majority opinion of the Court which affirms the trial court’s judgment on this issue.

I dissent to that part of the opinion which reviews and affirms the judgment as to the validity of the trust creating the Cherokee County Home Finance Authority. That issue has not been presented in an adversary posture.

I would adhere to the principles announced by our Court in Application of Fun Country Development Authority, 566 P.2d 1167 (Okl.1977) that we will issue no advisory opinions where no controversy is presented and no contest or challenge is made.

I am authorized to state that HAR-GRAVE, J., concurs in this concurring in part, dissenting in part opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.