holding that when two policies affording coverage each have clauses purporting to make their coverage excess if there is other insurance then each insurer will be proportionately liable based on coverage limits
How later courts described this case
- holding that when two policies affording coverage each have clauses purporting to make their coverage excess if there is other insurance then each insurer will be proportionately liable based on coverage limits
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
SULLIVAN, J
I dissent.
For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Transport Indem. Co., ante, p. 496 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 617 , 492 P.2d 673 ], it is my opinion that Transport, which issued a policy containing P.U.C. Endorsement No. Ill to cover Signal’s motor vehicles, must bear *518 the entire loss on this claim. Therefore, I would affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Wright, C. J., and Peters, J., concurred.