Opinion

State Banking Board v. Finger

  • 264 S.W. 151
  • 1924 Tex. App. LEXIS 584
Court
Court of Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jun 21, 1924
Status
Published
Author
O'Quinn
On the bench
O'Quinn
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.2%

The opinion

O’QUINN, J.

In this ease the parties plaintiffs and defendants are the same as in cause No. 1050, entitled State Banking Board et al. v. C. C. James et al., 264 S. W. 145 , this day decided by this court. The pleadings of the parties and the facts alleged and proven are similar in every detail, and the questions involved are the same as those in cause No. 1050, and the judgment to the sanie effect.

In cause No. 1050 we stated fully the pleadings and facts and discussed and determined the questions of law controlling the case. As the pleadings here are to the same effect as those in cause No. 1050, and the facts constituting the transactions here are of the same nature and to the same effect as those in cause No. 1050, and the questions involved are identical, and the judgment rendered to the same effect as that in cause No. 1050, there is no good reason for an extended statement of the pleadings and facts shown by the record here, nor for a discussion of the questions involved, and for same we here simply refer to our opinion in said cause No. 1050, and because of our holdings in that case the judgment here is reversed and rendered for appellants.

Reversed and rendered.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.