Opinion

Caldwell v. Baxter

158 Okla. 76
12 P.2d 509
1931 OK 538
1931 Okla. LEXIS 720

Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed: Sep 22, 1931
Status: Published
Author: Riley
On the bench: Andrews, Clark, Cullison, Hefner, Kornegay, Lester, McNEILL, Riley, Swindall
Cited by: 10 cases
Authority: More cited than 12.2%

The opinion

RILEY, J.,

concurs in conclusion, but dissents to the holding that repugnant defenses may not be united in one answer. Citing Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Ware, 71 Okla. 19 , 174 P. 1066 ; Covington v. Fisher, 22 Okla. 207 , 97 P. 615 .

ANDREWS, J., absent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.