Opinion

Courtney v. La Salle University

  • 124 F.3d 499
  • 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,284
  • 74 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1332
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 24913
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Filed
Aug 26, 1997
Author
Scirica
On the bench
Becker, Scirica, Schwarzer
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.9%

The opinion

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge,

concurring.

I doubt that any party to this lawsuit ever believed that Courtney and Halpin did not have tenured positions at La Salle. Indeed the Pennsylvania Superior Court stated, “Halpin and Courtney were granted tenure according to the conditions set forth in the Faculty Bulletin.” 1 Halpin v. LaSalle Univ., 432 Pa.Super. 476 , 639 A.2d 37, 38 (1994). Whatever else tenure may mean, its essence is protection from termination.

Yet the Pennsylvania Superior Court chose to define tenure here as entitlement to rank only and duration of employment from year to year only. Like Judge Becker I believe their decision was wrong but like Judge Schwarzer I believe we are bound to give it collateral effect.

. The Faculty Handbook provides:

[t]he full-time teacher under contract with tenure may competently expect to hold his/her position until he/she is retired for age or disability or separated for adequate cause under due process or because of financial exigencies of the institution. (AAUP Bul. SM 1964, p. 114).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.