Opinion

Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

  • 89 F.3d 976
  • 44 Fed. R. Serv. 1292
  • 27 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20083
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14887
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Filed
Jun 20, 1996
On the bench
Scirica, Nygaard, McKee, Becker, Stapleton, Mansmann, Cowen, Alito, Roth, Lewis, Sarokin
Cited by
8 cases

explaining that a “sterile and shallow” investigatory system— that routinely fails to sustain complaints of excessive force—can establish deliberate indifference

How later courts described this case

  • explaining that a “sterile and shallow” investigatory system— that routinely fails to sustain complaints of excessive force—can establish deliberate indifference
  • “Motions for judgment as a matter of law must be made before submission of the case to the jury____”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

The petition for rehearing filed by appellants Robin Anthony Gildart Jackson, an Underwriter at Lloyds, London, et al. in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the panel and the Court in banc, is denied. Judge McKee would grant rehearing.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.