Opinion

Brown v. Johnston

  • 95 Ohio App. 136
  • 63 Ohio Law. Abs. 91
  • 53 Ohio Op. 44
  • 108 N.E.2d 298
  • 1952 Ohio App. LEXIS 588
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Apr 8, 1952
Status
Published
On the bench
Wiseman, Miller, Hornbeck
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

No. 2169.

OPINION

By THE COURT:

Our rules make no provision for applications for rehearing. The application of Appellants will, therefore, not be considered.

The application fails to note that we held that plaintiff’s cause of action was not upon the written contract. The sup-

*96 plemental contract released the appellants from all obligations by them to be performed on the contract.

HORNBECK, PJ, WISEMAN and MILLER, JJ, concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.