Opinion

City of Raleigh v. Raleigh City Administrative Unit

  • 223 N.C. 316
  • 26 S.E.2d 591
  • 1943 N.C. LEXIS 261
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Jul 14, 1943
Status
Published
Author
WiNBORNE
On the bench
Deyin, Winborne, Stacy, Babnhill
Cited by
6 cases

The opinion

WiNBORNE, J.,

with whom Stacy, C. J., and BabNHill, J.,

concur, concurring in part and dissenting in part: The decision on plaintiff’s appeal here is predicated on decision on plaintiff’s appeal in No. 449, Raleigh v. Bank, ante, 286, and is contrary to our views there expressed. We, therefore, dissent here upon the grounds stated there.

We concur in the disposition of the defendant’s appeal.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.