Opinion

Pickle v. State

  • 453 S.W.3d 157
  • 2014 Ark. App. 726
  • 2014 Ark. LEXIS 659
  • 2014 Ark. App. LEXIS 1100
Court
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Filed
Dec 17, 2014
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Larry D. Vaught
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.6%

The opinion

Waymond M. Brown, Judge, concurring.

hi agree with the majority that this case should be reversed and remanded. I write separately to express my belief that game wardens may perform hunting-and-safety compliance checks without reasonable suspicion or explicit, neutral limitations. However, I believe that after a compliance check has been completed, any additional encounter must be based upon an explicit, neutral limitation as required by State v. Allen, 1 in order to prevent game wardens from relying on their own unbridled discretion. Therefore, I concur.

Gruber, J., joins in this concurrence.

. 2013 Ark. 35 , 425 S.W.3d 753 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.