Opinion

Sholberg v. Truman

  • 496 Mich. 1
  • 852 N.W.2d 89
Court
Michigan Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 10, 2014
Status
Published
Author
Cavanagh
On the bench
Viviano, Young, Kelly, Zahra, McCormack, Markman
Cited by
29 cases

The opinion

*18 CAVANAGH, J.

(concurring). I agree with the majority’s result for the reasons stated in the conclusion section of the opinion. Defendants are entitled to summary disposition because they were not in possession of the property, did not have control over the property, and did not create the alleged nuisance.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.