noting that “the proper remedy for an allied-offenses sentencing error” is to “‘reverse the judgment of conviction and remand for a new sentencing hearing’”
How later courts described this case
- noting that “the proper remedy for an allied-offenses sentencing error” is to “‘reverse the judgment of conviction and remand for a new sentencing hearing’”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Pfeifer, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
{¶ 38} I concur in the judgment of the majority and in the bulk of the majority opinion. I dissent, however, from any portion of the majority opinion that relies on or contains an approving reference to State v. Saxon, 109 Ohio St.3d 176 , 2006-Ohio-1245 , 846 N.E.2d 824 , for the reasons stated in my dissent in Saxon.