Opinion

IN THE MATTER OF A.F.K.

  • 317 P.3d 221
  • 2014 OK CIV APP 6
  • 2013 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 114
  • 2013 WL 6970903
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Dec 5, 2013
Status
Published
Author
Mitchell
On the bench
Goree, Mitchell, Hetherington, Mitchell'S
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.4%

commending trial court for providing verdict forms that included lines for checkmarks for the jury to identify each condition that the parent failed to correct

How later courts described this case

  • commending trial court for providing verdict forms that included lines for checkmarks for the jury to identify each condition that the parent failed to correct

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

MITCHELL, J.,

concurring specially.

€ 38 Although I highly approve of the verdict forms used in this case, the termination order is lacking. We have held previously that the termination order based on a failure to correct conditions must identify the uncorrected conditions on which termination is based. Matter of R.A., W.A., Z.A. and A.A., 2012 OK CIV APP 65, ¶ 17 , 280 P.3d 366 ; Matter of B.M.O., 1992 OK CIV APP 89 , 838 P.2d 38 ; Matter of E.M., 1999 OK CIV APP 32 , 976 P.2d 1098 ; Matter of B.C., 2010 OK CIV APP 103 , 242 P.3d 589 . The termination order in the instant case acknowledges the jury's findings, but fails to identify the uncorrected conditions on which termination is based. The order should identify the specific grounds for terminations and, if based on a failure to correct conditions, specifically identify those uncorrected conditions. I fully concur in all other respects.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.