using the term "nonrefundable retainer" to represent an advance payment of fees for hours of legal services that the attorney will perform in the future is impermissible
How later courts described this case
- using the term "nonrefundable retainer" to represent an advance payment of fees for hours of legal services that the attorney will perform in the future is impermissible
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
*179 TAYLOR, J.,
with whom WATT and COMBS, JJ., join, dissenting.
"I would impose suspension for two years and one day."