outlining the informed consent elements and explaining that the breach must be “the proximate cause of the patient’s injuries”
How later courts described this case
- outlining the informed consent elements and explaining that the breach must be “the proximate cause of the patient’s injuries”
- “Information pertaining to an ‘off-label’ use provides the patient with no information about the treatment itself.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ELDRIDGE, J.,
dissenting.
I dissent. See Univ. of Md. Medical System Corp. v. Waldt, 411 Md. 207, 238-242 (Adkins, J., dissenting), 250 (Raker, J., joined by Eldridge, J., dissenting), 983 A.2d 112, 130-133, 138 (2009).