holding that without 2 MORENO v. BELTRAN Opinion of the Court ARFLP 78(b) language, an order that does not resolve all pending claims is not final or appealable
How later courts described this case
- holding that without 2 MORENO v. BELTRAN Opinion of the Court ARFLP 78(b) language, an order that does not resolve all pending claims is not final or appealable
- providing that a family court ruling that resolves some but not all pending issues and does not have certification of finality is not final and appealable
- noting "a family court ruling is not final and appealable until all of the claims pending before the court have been resolved" or until the court has issued a "certification of finality" under Rule 78(b)
- enforcement order not appealable until court resolved request for attorneys’ fees
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
CATTANI, J.,
specially concurring.
¶21 I concur in the decision of the court that Husband timely appealed from the family court’s three rulings. I write separately to express my view that, until the Arizona Supreme Court resolves the conflict between the Ghadimi and Reeck decisions, an appellant who has complied with either of those rulings should be deemed to have satisfied the timeliness requirement for establishing jurisdiction in this court.