Opinion

United States v. James Robertson

  • 736 F.3d 1317
  • 2013 WL 6018910
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Filed
Nov 12, 2013
Status
Published
Author
Jordan
On the bench
Jordan, Cox, Dubina
Nature of suit
NEW
Cited by
21 cases

finding a prima facie case from the striking of a single African-American juror in the context of the case, which involved a white supremacist on trial for killing a African-American man and the venire contained only three African-American members

How later courts described this case

  • finding a prima facie case from the striking of a single African-American juror in the context of the case, which involved a white supremacist on trial for killing a African-American man and the venire contained only three African-American members
  • holding that the district court could consider the subject matter of the case being tried and the racial composition of the venire members
  • quot- ing 18 U.S.C. § 1959 (a)(1)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

JORDAN, Circuit Judge,

concurring.

Except as to the discussion and resolution of the Batson claim, I join the majority opinion. As to the Batson claim, I concur in the judgment. Although the district court initially (and improperly) appeared to use the cause standard when sustaining the government’s Batson challenge to the defense’s peremptory strike of JMD, see Trial Transcript [D.E. 207] at 342, it later confirmed, see Trial Transcript [D.E. 209] at 10, that it did not believe that defense counsel’s proffered reason for the strike of JMD was genuine. On this record, that finding of pretext was not clearly erroneous.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.