Opinion

Pickens v. State

  • 126 P.3d 612
  • 2005 OK CR 27
  • 2005 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 22
  • 2005 WL 3303863
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Dec 7, 2005
Status
Published
Author
Lewis
On the bench
Chapel, Johnson, Lewis, Lumpkin
Cited by
10 cases

corrections personnel testified about defendant’s communication deficits, noting that “things had to be explained to [him] more than once, in ‘simpler’ terms, and multi-syllabic words confused him”

How later courts described this case

  • corrections personnel testified about defendant’s communication deficits, noting that “things had to be explained to [him] more than once, in ‘simpler’ terms, and multi-syllabic words confused him”
  • applying plain error to alleged errors not raised before the trial court following determination of issue of mental retardation

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

LEWIS, Judge,

Concurs in part/Dissents in part.

¶ 11 concur in reversing the verdict in this case. However, I dissent to modifying the sentence. I would reverse and remand for a new trial on the issue of mental retardation.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.