Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Nunes

  • 233 Or. 547
  • 379 P.2d 579
  • 1963 Ore. LEXIS 305
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 13, 1963
Status
Published
Author
Denecke
On the bench
McAllister, Rossman, Perry, Sloan, O'Connell, Goodwin, Denecke
Cited by
19 cases

The opinion

DENECKE, J.,

dissenting.

The majority holds that the capitalization method, properly applied, may be used by an expert appraiser in determining value. The majority opinion further states that an expert can testify how he used this method in determining value. With this I concur. *565 The majority, however, remanded the ease for a new trial on the ground that the capitalization method was here improperly applied. To this I dissent, for the reason that the Commission’s objection was not that the capitalization method was being improperly applied, but that the capitalization method could not be used under any circumstances in determining value.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.