Opinion

State Construction Corporation v. Scoggins

  • 259 Or. 371
  • 485 P.2d 391
  • 1971 Ore. LEXIS 382
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
May 26, 1971
Status
Published
Author
Tongue
On the bench
Denecke, Bryson, Tongue
Cited by
15 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.2%

“A failure to disclose facts . . . amounts to fraud only where there is a duty to disclose.”

How later courts described this case

  • “A failure to disclose facts . . . amounts to fraud only where there is a duty to disclose.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

TONGUE, J.,

dissenting.

I join in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Bryson. I also question the constitutionality of a statutory procedure under which a homeowner can be deprived of his home without proof of actual notice of the proceedings under which his home was sold for failure to pay a delinquent assessment. See Walker v. Hutchinson City, 352 US 112, 116 , 77 S Ct 200 , 1 L ed 2d 178 (1956), and Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 US 306 , 70 S Ct 652 , 94 L ed 865 (1950). Cf. Hood River County v. Dabney, 246 Or 14 , 423 P2d 954 (1967). Thus, even though the question of constitutionality was not raised by plaintiff’s counsel, it is of such importance that I would set this case for reargument upon that question.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.