Opinion

Cranston v. Thomson

  • 530 P.2d 726
Court
Wyoming Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 17, 1975
Status
Published
Author
Guthrie
On the bench
Parker, McEwan, Guthrie, McClintock, Armstrong
Cited by
26 cases

seeking declaration that statutes requiring candidates to approve campaign expenditures and limiting campaign expenditures was unconstitutional

How later courts described this case

  • seeking declaration that statutes requiring candidates to approve campaign expenditures and limiting campaign expenditures was unconstitutional

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

GUTHRIE, Chief Justice.

Petition for rehearing having been filed by appellants, and the court having fully considered the same, but inasmuch as in the meantime Enrolled Act No. 131 relating to election procedures has been enacted by the Forty-Third Legislature and this amendment changes materially the provisions of §§ 22.1-389 and 22.1-401, W.S.1957, 1973 Cum.Supp., involved in the action; and it further appearing that further consideration of the Act as involved in-the action herein would have no effect upon existing rights, and that because of the amendment the action may be considered moot,

It is therefore ordered that the petition for rehearing be and the same is hereby denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.