Opinion

Stroud v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

  • 72 O.B.A.J. 3647
  • 37 P.3d 783
  • 2001 OK 76
  • 2001 Okla. LEXIS 129
  • 2001 WL 1104447
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Dec 4, 2001
Status
Published
On the bench
Boudreau, Hargrave, Hodges, Kauger, Lavender, Opala, Summers, Watt, Winchester
Cited by
35 cases

approving a trial court jury instruction allowing consideration only of that negligence of the plaintiff interfering with the accountant's rendition of professional services

How later courts described this case

  • approving a trial court jury instruction allowing consideration only of that negligence of the plaintiff interfering with the accountant's rendition of professional services
  • unpublished disposition listed in "Table of Unpublished Opinions" at 228 Wis.2d 510, 597 N.W.2d 774 (Wis.App. 1999)
  • “The scope of Andersen’s duty of care owed as a provider of professional accounting services is established not only by the formalized standards adopted by the American Institute of Certified Public Accounts — i.e., GAAS and GAAP — but also by the Oklahoma statutory and regulatory provisions which govern the field.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON REHEARING

{1 Rehearing is denied. The motion to tax costs in the form of $100.00 certiorari filing fee is granted. Title 20 O.S. Supp. 1996 § 30.4(B); Rule 1.14, Supreme Court Rules, 12 O.S. Supp. 1997, Ch. 15, App. 1; Sunrizon Homes, Inc. v. American Guaranty Investment Corp., 1998 OK 145 , ¶ 5, 782 P.2d 1083 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.