Opinion

In Re Adoption of SW

  • 73 O.B.A.J. 719
  • 41 P.3d 1003
  • 2002 OK CIV APP 26
  • 2001 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 154
  • 2001 WL 1804137
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Sep 18, 2001
Status
Published
Author
Taylor
On the bench
Keith Rapp
Cited by
13 cases

deciding best interests of the child is relevant in deciding whether to transfer jurisdiction

How later courts described this case

  • deciding best interests of the child is relevant in deciding whether to transfer jurisdiction
  • noting that “when the best interests standard is used, care must be taken to avoid a purely Anglo-American point of view” (footnote omitted)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

TAYLOR, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

{ 1 I concur with the majority's decision to reverse the trial court's order denying transfer of the proceedings to the tribal court. However, I would reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to sustain the Cherokee Nation's petition to transfer the case to the tribal court because the Appellees failed to show the existence of any good cause to deny the petition for transfer. 25 U.S.C. § 1911 (b).

T2 It also appears that placement preferences and other requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. § 1901 through § 1963, have not been followed.

T3 This case can be adequately presented in the tribal court without any undue hardship to the parties or witnesses.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.