Opinion

Grisby v. Progressive Preferred Insurance

  • 207 Or. App. 592
  • 142 P.3d 531
  • 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1347
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Sep 6, 2006
Status
Published
Author
Landau
On the bench
Landau, Schuman, Ortega
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.1%

The opinion

LANDAU, P. J.,

concurring.

Were we writing on a clean slate, I might arrive at a different result than the one that the majority reaches. I am not persuaded that its construction of the terms “coverage” and “amount of benefits” comports with their ordinary meanings or the meanings reflected in related statutes. I am persuaded, however, that the majority is correct in relying on Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 326 Or 294, 300 , 952 P2d 1012 (1998). For that reason, I concur in the result.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.