Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Bolusky

72 O.B.A.J. 832
23 P.3d 268
2001 OK 26
2001 Okla. LEXIS 28
2001 WL 243374

Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed: Mar 13, 2001
Status: Published
Author: Watt
On the bench: Summers, Hargrave, Hodges, Lavender, Opala, Kauger, Boudreau, Winchester, Watt
Cited by: 80 cases

explaining that a lawyer should not lie to a client about the status of his or her case under a rule identical to MRPC 8.4(c)

How later courts described this case

explaining that a lawyer should not lie to a client about the status of his or her case under a rule identical to MRPC 8.4(c)
attorney suspended for misrepresenting status of client’s case
client is not a “third person” within meaning of Rule 4.1

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WATT, V.C.J.,

dissenting.

T1 I would disbar this Respondent from the practice of law.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.