Opinion

Tax Appeal of Lewis v. Kawafuchi

  • 108 Haw. 69
  • 116 P.3d 711
Court
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Filed
Jul 26, 2005
Status
Published
Author
Watanabe
On the bench
Lim, Fujise, Watanabe
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.1%

The opinion

Concurring Opinion by

WATANABE, Acting C.J.

In light of Rules 1 1 and 29 2 of the Rules of the Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii, I believe that the separate judgment requirement of Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rule 58 may apply in some situations to Tax Appeal Court cases. See Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawaii 115, 119 , 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994). Indeed, in Rhoads v. Okamura, 98 Hawaii 407 , 49 P.3d 373 (2002), the Hawaii Supreme Court appears to have implicitly acknowledged that HRCP Rule 58 is applicable to such cases. Id. at 410-11 , 49 P.3d at 376-77 .

In this case, however, AppellanL-Appellant Donald A. Lewis (Lewis) is appealing an order dismissing his appeal to the Tax Appeal Court in its entirety, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In Ellis v. Crockett, 51 Haw. 45 , 451 P.2d 814 , reh’g denied, 51 Haw. 86 , 451 P.2d 814 (1969), the Hawaii Supreme Court held that “[a]n order dismissing a complaint in its entirety is a judgment denying all relief to the plaintiff whose complaint is being dismissed[,]” and that an “order dismissing the entire case is in fact a judgment ” governed by HRCP Rule 58. Id. at 59 , 451 P.2d at 824 (emphases in original). In light of Ellis , the facts of which are distinguishable from Jenkins , I agree that we have appellate jurisdiction to consider the merits of Lewis’s appeal. In all other respects, I concur with the majority’s opinion.

. Rule 1 of the Rules of the Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii (RTACSH) provides, in relevant part:

FORM AND STYLE OF PAPERS.

The form and style of papers filed with the court shall be in conformity with the requirements of ... the Hawaii Revised Statutes, the Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 3 of the Rules of the Circuit Courts of the State of Hawaii.

RTACSH Rule 1 (emphasis added).

. Rule 29 of the RTACSH provides, in relevant part, as follows:

GENERAL PROCEDURE.

In procedural matters not specifically provided for by the foregoing rules, the court will be guided, to the extent applicable, by the Rules of the Circuit Courts of the State of Hawaii, and the Hawai ‘i Rules of Civil Procedure.

RTACSH Rule 29 (emphases added).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.